A few years ago I was speaking with Knox Duncan (now at Wong Doody in Seattle), and he said when he worked on Nike at W+K the the production budget was bigger than all of our agency billings combined when we worked together at my last shop. This quote resurfaces a lot in my mind, particularly lately, as the percentage of production to media seems to be decreasing when it should be opposite.
Good production is spreadable in a new media world. Evian just spent a lot of money on production for an online ad which was posted on You Tube to promote their Live Young positioning. MSNBC described the campaign like this:
I can always tell something is popular when my wife tells me to watch it and something that I didn't find on an industry Blog. This is exactly what Propagation Planning should produce.
Is it hard to move a larger part of your budget to production to earn media and spend less in paid media? Please share your thoughts in the comments section.


Yes, it's very hard to explain the transition to marketing decision-makers right now. Beyond the production cost issue in and of itself, the core problem seems to be an overall misconception of what social media is and is not.
The fallacy, often spread by agents within our industry who ought to know better, is that "viral marketing" means getting something for next to nothing. To many, "viral" is a dream equation of cheap production, free media, and automatic word-of-mouth. The latter of these is the most dangerous misperception in our view.
Effective social media marketing takes insight-based strategic planning, appropriate production, personal engagement and in many cases, supplemental purchased media.
It's not cheap. But it still provides an outstanding value. Rather than selling social media as a "less costly" alternative, our industry needs to focus on making it a "more efficient" solution. In terms of consumer engagement, it's not "half off" but it might be "buy one get two free."
Posted by: Kate Whatley - Social Forces | 07/10/2009 at 03:48 PM
Thanks for your thoughts Kate. I completely agree with you.
Posted by: Griffin Farley | 07/13/2009 at 04:30 PM